Where do we seize adjectives of our "News" from?

No matter what paper we read, or which T.V. News pipe we watch, the "News" is always like.

The news comes from a source, and no concern how you hear it, it should be the same when you hear it.
But, outlets have to spin the communication to suit their customers liking.
as below

A man is taking a walk surrounded by Central park in New York. Suddenly he sees a touch girl being attacked by a pit bull dog . He runs over and starts fighting near the dog. He succeeds in killing the dog and positive the girl's life. A policeman who was watching the scene walk over and says: "You are a hero, tomorrow you can read it in adjectives the newspapers: "Brave New Yorker saves the duration of little girl" The man says: - "But I am not a New Yorker!" "Oh ,then it will utter in newspapers within the morning: 'Brave American saves life of little girl'" – the policeman answers. "But I am not an American!" – say the man. "Oh, what are you then? " The man says: - "I am a Saudi !" The subsequent day the newspapers say: "Islamic extremist kills innocent American.
because the press is controlled, we don;t enjoy free press and so only so much opinion can be printed. and we get hold of the news directly from the people who are creating the report most of the time other wise it is unreliable ,for example if it is from a 'close friend' or a 'source'
Consider this:

When bottled water first came out, we hear rumors of the guy that used the same tap marine for multiple "private" labels. In the end, no event what title came on the label, his customers be all drinking the same stuff, thump water.

Listen to Rush Limbaugh or CNN, Glen Beck or Chris Mathews. Read the Wall Street Journal or the New York Times, the Deseret News or the San Francisco Chronicle and you will see that they are all drinking like tap water from one and the same fountain. The real question the world should be asking is, who owns the fountain?

The answer as you would expect, all propaganda aside, is the Rothschild Family.

Now, The House of Rothschild bought Reuters news service within the 1800's. Within the last 20 years, Reuters bought the Associated Press. Now the Elite own the two largest wire services contained by the world, where most newspapers bring their news. The Rothschilds have control of adjectives three U.S. (Television) Networks, plus other aspects of the recording and mass media industry according to research by Eustice Mullins within his book, 'Who Owns the TV Networks'.

In the "Old Days" the big Newspapers employed their own reporters, as did many of the radio stations. There was a indisputable competition for new's and "scoops" were the journalistic prize sought after by so many of them.
Go wager on to the Progressive Movement and read Ida Tarbell's scathing expose on Rothschild creation, Nelson Rockefeller, and his Standard Oil Monopoly and you will quickly see the benefits of a truly free Press.

The merely way to get a true grip on what is up in this World today is to scour the internet.
This and only this,...is the explanation behind the so called "gun down switch" for the net.
It is to prevent you, the People, from finding out what is going on.

This is the truth.
let's say bbc,biggest report source in uk,but very small report sources let's say like Metro weekly can not afford to finance their own agents and they make a matter with bbc that bbc will supply them with any source of info
The medium who are owned by wealthy special interests who skew the news that you see so as to generate you hate the people they antipathy, and love the people they love.

Related Questions: