Those relations who answer assisted suicide; should it merely be kept unofficial for relatives; how does anyone hold?

the right to deny strangers, who might be more knowledgeable and worldly than them, the right to have assisted suicide if they choose
Answers:
The individual can do what they want. No one else have a say-so about their body or what to do with it. The horror was that if people are allowed to provide the drugs to bad someone then that would be illegal plus that would go off the door open to people freshly offing each other. So the law states a human being can say in their will what they want done and when. There are a few documents involved, such as a DNR when a creature is ill, they sign the DNR (do not recussitate) and the medical staff needs to hang to that document. There is a living will in which a person signs and dictates how they want to travel whether they want medication, at what point the plug should be pulled, etc, but it's stated and signed by the individual themself regarding wishes about their own body and vivacity. Then there is a surrogate document which a person have drawn up that tells next of kin or a correct friend how to take care of them, how to receive decisions for them if they are in a coma, and what operation can be done if they can't hear or talk. That way the individual decide for themself.
Why would you want a stranger to minister to you die? If assisted suicide was made legal contained by this country why would you stop relatives helping the term. ill party to die?

I personally think that if a being has no quality of duration left and feels it would be better for them to die and easier on their ancestral why should someone stop them, so long as the person is in the right frame of mind and is competent to say for them selves that they want to die why should they be stopped?

If this is what a person wishes to do i construe they should be given a Lethal injection this is the practice of injecting a person with a cruel dose of drugs (typically a barbiturate, paralytic, and potassium solution) for the express purpose of causing the immediate release.
This will then mean they will die more or smaller number instantly and it will cause them no pain.


IF A PERSON IS NOT ILL AND JUST HAS PROBLEMS THEY FEEL THEY CAN'T COPE WITH THEN I DONT THINK THEY SHOULD BE ASSISTED TO DIE. IN THIS CASE I THINK THEY SHOULD BE GIVEN THE APPROPRIATE HELP AND LEFT TO LIVE.
If they aren't smart plenty to commit suicide without assistance, I don't think they are more knowledgable or wordly than anyone.
I honestly do not think it has anything to do beside knowledge or worldliness. It has to do next to a humane way to not suffer.
I am for it. As long as it is followed to the letter of the decree. Patients must be term. ill and enjoy multiple doc. opinions and there is no ability of life left.
I my self would not want to be departed to rot while alive, unable to eat or unqualified to perform basic each day functions on my own, or be in so much pain that even combing your coat becomes an impossible task.
This is in recent times my opinion, but suffering is not how I want to live. I would want to die with dignity and control.


Related Questions: