Defeating terrorism - would this be more cost forceful?

Simply air drop nice things to the general population of contested regions. If you be getting nice useful stuff dropped on you (instead of bombs) why would you want to drive the ISAF coalition out of Afghanistan ?

With their cost of living would it really cost very much more than the billions immediately being spent on surveillance and extremely expensive guided munitions?

I say this singular partly tongue in cheek
Look within the real world.
Decode this lyrics " You'll see "
"Wonderful world"
"Don't know much"
"Time after time"
"The Great Commandments"
"The Final Countdown"
"Games people play"
"The Master mind"
Domino effect?
Knowing the winter sport?
Luke 21.30-36
Luke 9.25,55-56,60
Luke 8.5-8,10-17
Luke 24.44-45,47-48
What do you think? Source(s): decoded from the missing x-files. TOM P's get it right. if we airdropped food, health supplies, ect, into these areas, the tribal groups/warlords would prevent any of it from getting to civilians.
How can you defeat terrorism when the UK is letting them stale after conviction and making celebrity of them as in the baggage of Binyam Mohammed who went to Afghanistan with a copy passport visiting terrorist camp. The immigration system allow known/convicted terrorist to stay within this country (UK) but persecute and deport BLACK people who commit non violent crimes. The UK is a terrorist lover and you ain't see nothing yet because the terrorist know they are untouchables because the political affairs is running scared of them and their high profile barristers.
The big countries tried this near Africa and it did not work.
Crime and Corrupted officials are in the achievement. Source(s): I am what I am TOM P is right also. That's really what happened behind the movie of Black Hawk Down. The warlords or corrupted official are starving off the civilian population. If you do nouns drop nice things to the general population, you need someone to control it capably, that is why you see US soldiers sometimes help distributing toys, food, and other supplies so in that will be no interference.

I really can't say if it would be more cost effective. It is a factor surrounded by defeating terrorism but not the only solution. I construe to defeat terrorism, we need to listen what the other side have to say.
Build a few MacDonalds, Nike shoe factories etc supply them running water and opportunities etc thats how to clobber it

Related Questions: