Does the human rights exploit 1998 apply to a monkey put on trial?
does the human rights act 1998 apply to a monkey put on trial? or does the monkey only go and get the animal rights act??
Answers:
I haven't hear of monkeys being tried since people contained by the North East of England tried and executed some as spies during the Napoleonic Wars.
Once non human sentients like aliens, AI's and uplifted animals com around, you will necessitate a new law, something along the lines of rights for sentients.
coz human rights law only apply to humans
although if you're advanced enough to breed AI's and uplifts, most likely there will also be heavily bioengineered humans which will be complex to distinguish from uplifted animals
The Human Rights Act applies to Humans. Clue is in the title. It consequently does not apply to monkeys. And before you post lots more question similar to this asking if the Human Rights Act is applicable to a herring, or an acacia bush, or a puff adder, etc, etc, perhaps you can answer me a question - why on Earth is a monkey anyone put on a trial in the first place?
The Answer is contained by the question.
It isn't Human.
And Animals don't have Rights, unless they argue otherwise.
The only right the monkey has is those given to him through the animals right exploit, if the animal was use in a crime and someone died the the animal can be put to loss, bar the Animal right activist.
Related Questions:
Answers:
I haven't hear of monkeys being tried since people contained by the North East of England tried and executed some as spies during the Napoleonic Wars.
Once non human sentients like aliens, AI's and uplifted animals com around, you will necessitate a new law, something along the lines of rights for sentients.
coz human rights law only apply to humans
although if you're advanced enough to breed AI's and uplifts, most likely there will also be heavily bioengineered humans which will be complex to distinguish from uplifted animals
The Human Rights Act applies to Humans. Clue is in the title. It consequently does not apply to monkeys. And before you post lots more question similar to this asking if the Human Rights Act is applicable to a herring, or an acacia bush, or a puff adder, etc, etc, perhaps you can answer me a question - why on Earth is a monkey anyone put on a trial in the first place?
The Answer is contained by the question.
It isn't Human.
And Animals don't have Rights, unless they argue otherwise.
The only right the monkey has is those given to him through the animals right exploit, if the animal was use in a crime and someone died the the animal can be put to loss, bar the Animal right activist.
Related Questions:
- Is it unendorsed for me to put CCTV outside my house minus giving general public mind that it's near?
- How do consequence nouns, situational nouns, deontological nouns and the end one be aware of more or less abortion?
- Right to protest by burning the poppy on november 11th?
- Does it business where on earth I study imperative?
- What are the seven gateways in connection with desperate traits evidence?